Attack on Bombay/Mumbai
BBC analyzes how this massacre is different from previous ones. How crazed can the terrorists be to hold hostages at hospitals, hotels and restaurants?
India - and Mumbai - are no stranger to terrorism but the attacks on multiple targets in the city mark a significant step change.
Previous attacks involved the leaving of explosives in public places like markets or on trains. These could be devastating in terms of the loss of life, with nearly 200 killed in 2006.
But the latest attacks are different in terms of both method and scale, with teams of well-armed men involved in synchronised attacks - the gunmen were also clearly prepared to die in their attacks.
Another major difference is the targeting of restaurants and hotels used by westerners and the apparent singling out of those with British and American passports.
This points to either a major shift in strategy by an existing group or the influence or direction of outside parties, perhaps even al-Qaeda, whose style of attacks this mimics.
The growing tide of attacks raises major problems for the Indian authorities
A group calling itself the Deccan Mujahideen has claimed responsibility for the attacks but little is known of it.
The men were of South Asian appearance and reportedly spoke Hindi, indicating they originated in India.
Attacks over recent years have seen a variety of different groups named, particularly the Indian Mujahideen who had apparently threatened to attack Mumbai in September, claiming that Muslims had been harassed.
The authorities have often pointed the finger at the Students' Islamic Movement of India, believing that other groups like the Indian Mujahideen are a front for this banned organisation.
Some attacks have also been blamed on Lashkar-e-Toiba, which India says is backed by Pakistan's intelligence agency the ISI.
Wider impact
The Mumbai attackers appeared South Asian and reportedly spoke Hindi
If India does point the finger at Pakistan, then major diplomatic problems could ensue, but that may be less likely to happen as quickly as occurred in the past when relations were more fraught.
An attack by militants on the Indian parliament in December 2001 nearly led to war between the two countries.
The chaotic picture has been further confused recently by claims that Hindu nationalist groups had also been behind some recent bomb attacks.
The growing tide of attacks, particularly this year, raises major problems for the Indian authorities.
As well as tracking down any gunmen who have escaped, the local and national authorities will also have to deal with the issue of public confidence in their ability to get a grip on the situation.
After previous attacks, Mumbai bounced back quickly as a city with life getting back to normal and people travelling on the trains again, but this attack may have a different psychological impact, not least on visitors to the city.
India - and Mumbai - are no stranger to terrorism but the attacks on multiple targets in the city mark a significant step change.
Previous attacks involved the leaving of explosives in public places like markets or on trains. These could be devastating in terms of the loss of life, with nearly 200 killed in 2006.
But the latest attacks are different in terms of both method and scale, with teams of well-armed men involved in synchronised attacks - the gunmen were also clearly prepared to die in their attacks.
Another major difference is the targeting of restaurants and hotels used by westerners and the apparent singling out of those with British and American passports.
This points to either a major shift in strategy by an existing group or the influence or direction of outside parties, perhaps even al-Qaeda, whose style of attacks this mimics.
The growing tide of attacks raises major problems for the Indian authorities
A group calling itself the Deccan Mujahideen has claimed responsibility for the attacks but little is known of it.
The men were of South Asian appearance and reportedly spoke Hindi, indicating they originated in India.
Attacks over recent years have seen a variety of different groups named, particularly the Indian Mujahideen who had apparently threatened to attack Mumbai in September, claiming that Muslims had been harassed.
The authorities have often pointed the finger at the Students' Islamic Movement of India, believing that other groups like the Indian Mujahideen are a front for this banned organisation.
Some attacks have also been blamed on Lashkar-e-Toiba, which India says is backed by Pakistan's intelligence agency the ISI.
Wider impact
The Mumbai attackers appeared South Asian and reportedly spoke Hindi
If India does point the finger at Pakistan, then major diplomatic problems could ensue, but that may be less likely to happen as quickly as occurred in the past when relations were more fraught.
An attack by militants on the Indian parliament in December 2001 nearly led to war between the two countries.
The chaotic picture has been further confused recently by claims that Hindu nationalist groups had also been behind some recent bomb attacks.
The growing tide of attacks, particularly this year, raises major problems for the Indian authorities.
As well as tracking down any gunmen who have escaped, the local and national authorities will also have to deal with the issue of public confidence in their ability to get a grip on the situation.
After previous attacks, Mumbai bounced back quickly as a city with life getting back to normal and people travelling on the trains again, but this attack may have a different psychological impact, not least on visitors to the city.
Comments